These are issues documented for the Jetour T2 in general - things to check for, not a diagnosis of any particular car. Whether a specific car has one depends on its age, mileage, service history and how it was used.
Free Vehicle Check
Looking at one of these for sale? Check the exact vehicle free.
Enter the listing or vehicle details and AutoLytiQs will compare its price, specification and documented risks.
Applies to: 1.5T turbopetrol, 6-speed DCT (Dashing/X70 Plus pre-July-2026-facelift, 115kW/230Nm) / 1.5T turbopetrol, 7-speed DCT (Dashing/X70 Plus post-July-2026-facelift, 125kW/270Nm; T1… and 1 more - not every engine this model has been sold with
ⓘ Not yet individually classified
Symptoms to watch for
Dashing (pre-facelift 1.5T 6DCT, Businessday.co.za, 24 Oct 2024): 'turbo lag in a standing start' and the car 'wanting to leap out of the blocks at the slightest touch of throttle' particularly noted when reversing - reviewer concluded the drivetrain 'could benefit from revised throttle calibration or gear ratios to make it less jumpy'. Real-world fuel consumption measured at 10.0L/100km mixed driving versus the factory-claimed 7.8L/100km - a 28% gap.
T1 2.0T Odyssey XWD (AutoTrader South Africa): 'dead space on the throttle pedal and a grabby 1st gear on the DCT box' described as making city driving unpleasant. Manufacturer claims 9.0L/100km; the reviewer's best-case figure (favourable conditions) was 8.9L/100km, but typical/normal driving consumption ranged 10.9-12.0L/100km - a 21-33% gap above the claimed figure in ordinary use despite the car being technically capable of closely matching the claim under ideal conditions.
T2 Odyssey AWD (CAR Magazine): 'slightly clumsy throttle programming, especially on pull-away' causing the front wheels to 'scrabble for grip' before the clutch-based all-wheel-drive system engages. Manufacturer claims 9.3L/100km; the reviewer's own standardised fuel route recorded 11.6L/100km - a 25% gap, attributed by the reviewer partly to the vehicle's 1.9-tonne mass and the throttle-mapping character itself.
X70 Plus (this project's own existing related documented issue, sourced from AutoTrader South Africa's 'How reliable is the Jetour X70?'): throttle response 'initially dull when pulling away, followed by an overly sensitive surge', and the 6-speed DCT 'sometimes criticised as feeling unbalanced or jerky at low speeds' - the same general character as the other three models, though no numeric real-world fuel-consumption figure was found for the X70 Plus specifically in either this pass or a related documented issue's own research (an honest gap, not filled with an invented number).
What To Check
Genuinely test-drive-detectable, but only under the right conditions: a real standstill launch with normal throttle input, reversing, and low-speed manoeuvring - not a smooth, gentle, highway-biased test drive. All four real findings used in this card were specifically about pull-away/low-speed behaviour. The fuel-consumption gap is not detectable on a short test drive at all and requires either trusting the independent press figures cited here or a longer ownership trial/fuel-log comparison.
No Documented Failure Pattern Yet (Model Too New)
General · severity: Unknown - genuinely not yet determinable from available data. · confidence: 55/100 · 1 cited source
Applies to: 1.5L turbocharged petrol - not every engine this model has been sold with
ⓘ Not yet individually classified
What To Check
With no known defect pattern to specifically check for, a standard thorough test drive and inspection is as reliable here as for any vehicle of this age/mileage generally.
This is everything documented for this issue - no repair-cost estimate or TSB/recall reference was found for it, so there's nothing further behind a full report for this specific finding.
Payload Rating Corrected 300kg to 475kg - Check Registration Paperwork on Earlier Units
Regulatory / Compliance Documentation (GVM/payload rating) - not a mechanical defect · severity: Low as a mechanical matter (no hardware change was required or made, per Jetour SA's own statement), but genuinely real practical relevance for a buyer whose specific vehicle's paperwork has not yet caught up with the correction, or who is unaware the higher, safer rating now formally applies · confidence: 55/100 · 1 cited source
Applies to: All T1 and T2 engine/drivetrain variants - the source's own quoted company statement… - not every engine this model has been sold with
ⓘ Not yet individually classified
Symptoms to watch for
A pre-28-August-2026 owner's manual, compliance/VIN plate, dealer brochure, or original sale/NatIS registration paperwork may still show the superseded 300kg payload figure rather than the corrected 475kg figure
Potential confusion or conflicting information between what a private seller states (possibly still quoting the old 300kg figure in good faith) and what the vehicle is now officially rated for
No physical or driving symptom applies - a vehicle loaded to what was believed to be its 300kg limit was, per Jetour SA's own corrected figure, always genuinely capable of significantly more; the correction does not indicate any vehicle became less safe or less capable
What To Check
Not a test-drive-detectable matter - this is purely a documentation/regulatory-rating question. Check the vehicle's compliance/VIN plate and registration paperwork, and confirm directly with the dealer or Jetour South Africa, rather than attempting to assess it through driving or inspection.
Full documented findings available
Check a specific real listing for this vehicle and see the evidence behind 2 of 3 documented issues - one report, only R69, once:
Specific fault code to scan for
1 verified manufacturer TSB/recall reference you can check yourself
A recommended fix or negotiation point for each issue
A downloadable PDF report
No subscription · One-time payment · Instant access
Estimated Service Costs
Major service
R 5,500
Annual upkeep
R 2,400
Brake job (pads/discs)
R 3,100
Filter kit
R 650
Estimate only. No dedicated South African service-cost figure was found for this exact model, so these numbers are based on a comparable vehicle or a reasoned estimate. Treat them as a rough guide and get a direct quote.
Questions South African Buyers Ask
Is the Jetour T2 reliable?
Genuinely too new for a real used-market failure pattern - no confirmed defect exists yet, though real, generous manufacturer backing exists (7-year/200,000km warranty). A real, independently-corroborated low-speed throttle/DCT calibration harshness and fuel-consumption gap is documented across the current Jetour range, including the T2. A real, dated (28 August 2026) payload rating correction from 300kg to 475kg applies to every T1 and T2 sold in South Africa to date - a documentation/compliance matter, not a mechanical defect, but genuinely worth checking on an earlier-registered unit.
Evidence: Not yet individually classified · last reviewed 2026-09-07
The payload correction applies to every T1/T2 sold to date; the throttle/DCT finding is a range-wide calibration characteristic.
What to check: Confirm the vehicle's current NRCS-approved payload rating with the dealer or Jetour SA directly, and test-drive with a real standstill launch for throttle/DCT harshness.
No confirmed defect pattern exists yet - this is an honest 'too new' finding, not a hidden-defect one. Real, documented characteristics are low-speed throttle/DCT calibration harshness (shared across the current Jetour range) and a real payload rating correction (300kg to 475kg) affecting every T1/T2 sold in South Africa to date. The payload correction was a real, company-confirmed running change following viral public safety criticism - no hardware change was required, per Jetour SA's own statement, but paperwork on an earlier-registered unit may not yet reflect it.
Evidence: Not yet individually classified · last reviewed 2026-09-07
The payload correction applies to every T1/T2 sold to date.
What to check: Confirm the vehicle's compliance paperwork reflects the corrected 475kg payload rating, and test-drive for throttle/DCT harshness at low speed.
No repair cost applies to the documented findings - the throttle/DCT characteristic is a calibration matter, not a hardware fault, and the payload rating correction is a paperwork/compliance matter with no hardware change required. Genuinely too new for any other confirmed failure pattern or repair cost to have emerged yet.
Evidence: Not yet individually classified · last reviewed 2026-09-07
No cost figure exists because no confirmed mechanical defect exists yet.
What to check: Rely on standard pre-purchase inspection, since no model-specific repair cost data exists yet.
What should I check before buying a used Jetour T2?
Confirm the vehicle's current NRCS-approved payload rating with the dealer or Jetour SA directly - a real, dated correction (300kg to 475kg) applies to every T1/T2 sold to date, and an earlier-registered unit's paperwork may not yet reflect it. Test-drive with a real standstill launch for throttle/DCT harshness. This is a genuinely new model with strong manufacturer backing (7-year/200,000km warranty) but no real-world failure history yet - a standard thorough pre-purchase inspection is the relevant diligence.
Evidence: Not yet individually classified · last reviewed 2026-09-07
General buying guidance for the documented T2 profile - not a diagnosis of any specific vehicle.
What to check: Confirm payload rating paperwork is corrected, test-drive for low-speed throttle/DCT harshness, and get a standard pre-purchase inspection.
This guide summarises documented, sourced findings for the Jetour T2 generally. It is not an assessment of any specific vehicle - mileage, service history and condition vary by example. A full AutoLytiQs™ report checks a specific listing for sale against this data plus a live South African market valuation, to tell you whether that exact vehicle is a good buy.